# Causality Help!?!?

I have a regression model with 1 Y variable and 2 X variables (R sq = .66). The Y variable, and one of the X variables are likely interdependent (based on deep domain knowledge of 20+ years).

When I swap the Y variable and the X variable (making the Y independent and X dependent )…. the resulting new regression model shows the new X variable (formerly Y) with a value of .49. This is pretty strong, but significantly weaker than the former X variable (now Y variable) which previously had a p value of .10.

What conclusions can I make? Can I say that the original X variable has ~twice as much effect on the trend (.90 / .51) as the new (swapped) X variable? Even better, can I say that ~2/3rds [.90/(.90+.51)] of trend is a function of the original X variable (this is actually what I believe based on domain knowledge)?

(Note - I know only enough to be dangerous about regression)

## Answer

**Answers can only be viewed under the following conditions:**

- The questioner was satisfied with and accepted the answer, or
- The answer was evaluated as being 100% correct by the judge.

- answered
- 364 views
- $10.00

### Related Questions

- Probability that the distance between two points on the sides of a square is larger than the length of the sides
- Can someone explain why the attached R-Studio Code, provided by the author, does not create the output like in his book?
- Bernoulli problem
- Number of different drinks that can be made using 6 ingredients
- Calculating P values from data.
- How to adjust for an additional variable.
- Stochastic Processes Questions
- Help structure linear mixed effects model random effects structure