Set theory question
I am reading J. Neveu's "Mathematical foundations of the calculus of probability." There he presents what he calls a distributivity formula: $$\bigcup_{j \in J} \bigcap_{i \in I_j} F_i^j=\bigcap_{\{i_j\} \in K}\bigcup_{j \in J} F_{i_j}^j$$ where $K=\Pi_{j\in J}I_j$ (the set of all sequences \{$i_j, j \in J$\}). My question is regarding the notation. The LHS is quite clear to me. However, I'm now sure what are actually the members of K. Say $J=\{1,2,\ldots\}$ and $I_j=\{1,2,\ldots\}$. What is actually $i_j$ here? I'd appreciate an illumination on the RHS here and what is actually going on there..
Answer
 The questioner was satisfied and accepted the answer, or
 The answer was disputed, but the judge evaluated it as 100% correct.

Thanks. I think I am beginning to understand. For simplicity's sake, let's assume j={1,2} and I_j={1,2,...}. What are the members in $I_1 \times I_2$?

That's just NxN: you have to pick one element from I_1 and one element from I_2, so you get pairs of positive integers.

I accidentally hit the accept instead of submitting another comment :) So bear with me here. So ${i_j} \in K$ is a combination of a member from $I_1$ and from $I_2$. So what is confusing to me is what is the $j$ indexing doing there?

Well, the j indexing is the index of the family I_j. So, if J={1,2}, you have I_1 x I_2, but if J = {1,2,3} you'd get I_1 x I_2 x I_3 instead. If your element was, say, {i_j} = (4,7,1) \in NxNxN, you'd have i_1 = 4, i_2 = 7, i_3 = 1.

Ok. So that was confusing to me as {i_j} could as well be (1,1,1) in the example you gave, and the $j$ index is just to say that it is a $J$tuple? But if ${i_j}$ is a $j$tuple, what is F_{i_j}^j? How can you index F by a $j$tuple? Hope that makes sense.

Ok I think I understand. So ${i_j}$ denotes the sequence and $i_j$ denotes a member from $I_j$, right?

Yes that's correct! And F_{i_j}^j is just some set, it doesn't really matter.

Thanks :)

You're welcome!
 answered
 159 views
 $10.00