Can we consider the field of futures probabilities as a chaotic system ?
We illustrate the field of futures probabilities using the concept of the ?cone of plausibility?:
https://studentsatthecenterhub.org/resource/toolexploringplausibleprobablepossiblepreferredfutures/
Suppose that for any time value tn in this projected cone we had a value y1 and a value y2 to define the upper and the lower limits of plausibility ? or extremum of the bidimensional cone slice for the time value tn ? see the graph: https://www.aamus.org/2011/09/16/futuristfridayexploringtheconeofplausibility/
M = (y1+y2)/2
Which would expressed on the graphs by the default vector of time.
 Having defined a bounded space, could we consider the field of future probabilities ? included between y1 and y2 in the cone of plausibility at tn and observable from t0 ? as a chaotic system ?
 If it can be considered as so, would it be a linear or a nonlinear system ?
 If it can be considered as so, could we call M for the time value tn an attractor ? A global attractor ? Something else ?
 Finally, if it can be considered as so and if you had to express your mathematician's point of view, would such a system have any interest, be practical, or useful ?

I got a message saying 'Page not found' from both links.

My bad, I corrected it but the hyperlinks are down now. Thank for the notification

0. y_1 and y_2 are not really well defined. The cone is a didactic representation to explain a concept, but there is no way to define a boundary for the possibilities or the 'extremum' of all possibilities. 1. Barring my previous comment, you could choose to model it as such. Modeling is always a choice, I'm afraid. 2. You choose. 3. Depends on the equations we end up positing. 4. I fear there are too many things undefined. The cone works conceptually but not mathematically.

Please consider that y1 and y2 are defined as working extremums through a non classical logical system but it cannot be disclosed here. Would it change something ? If i understand correctly, modeling this would produce a totally abstract system. Exploring this part of mathematic for a potential application was necessary before continuing my work. Is there a mathematical working consensus to represent "the futur field of possibilities" ? If yes, is it linear or nonlinear ?
 closed
 145 views
 $20.00
Related Questions
 Probability and Statistics Question
 joint continuous probability function finding covariance
 Wiener process probability
 applied probability
 A bag contains 3 red jewels and 7 black jewels. You randomly draw the jewels out one by one without replacement. What is the probability that the last red jewel was the 8th one withdrawn?
 Statistics and Probability
 Find a number for 𝛼 so f(x) is a valid probability density function
 Goalscorer Probability question