Representation theory quick question
Answer
Answers can only be viewed under the following conditions:
- The questioner was satisfied with and accepted the answer, or
- The answer was evaluated as being 100% correct by the judge.
-
Thank you! Is there any way to show that these are indeed the only subrepresentations?
-
Yes. The one-dimensional subrep is clearly irreducible and the 2-dim is as well, since rho(x) and rho(y) do not have any common eigenspace. So any other subrep must decompose as a sum of irred. reps, which must be the ones previously found. But the only options then are U, V, and U+V = F_2^3.
-
*any other common eigenspace
-
Hello there, are you available to answer some more questions today, with a $60 price for each? They're related to fields and Galois theory
The answer is accepted.
Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing
Program to earn up to a 50% commission on every question that your affiliated users ask or answer.
- answered
- 541 views
- $20.00
Related Questions
- Prove that language L = {a^p ; p is prime} isn't regular using Myhill-Nerode theorem.
- Confused on this graph question, not sure how to reduce it to linear and It looks too wonky to draw a best fit line, probably won't take long
- Attempting to make a formula/algorithm based on weighted averages to find how much equipment we need to maintain.
- Let $z = f(x − y)$. Show that $\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=0$
- Root of $x^2+1$ in field of positive characteristic
- Find $a,b,c$ so that $\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1& 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\\ a & b & c \end{bmatrix} $ has the characteristic polynomial $-\lambda^3+4\lambda^2+5\lambda+6=0$
- What am I doing wrong?
- Algebra 1 Word Problem #3
