Exercise on Ito's rule for two correlated stocks.
Answer
Answers can only be viewed under the following conditions:
- The questioner was satisfied with and accepted the answer, or
- The answer was evaluated as being 100% correct by the judge.
2 Attachments
Mathe
3.3K
The answer is accepted.
Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing
Program to earn up to a 50% commission on every question that your affiliated users ask or answer.
- answered
- 340 views
- $25.00
Related Questions
- Calculus problem
- Find equation of the tangent line using implicit differentiation
- Help with Norms
- Find the values of a, for which the system is consistent. Give a geometric interpretation of the solution(s).
- Use Stokes's Theorem to evaluate $\iint_S ( ∇ × F ) ⋅ d S$ on the given surface
- You have a piece of 8-inch-wide metal which you are going to make into a gutter by bending up 3 inches on each side
- Calculus word problem
- Work problem involving pumping water from tank
I believe a question in advanced math material warrants a much higher bounty.
What are they typically worth?
I believe for a problem on stochastic calculus and going over your solution, a bounty of $25 is warranted.
Thank you for making me aware :)
I think you set it to $20 and not $25. Perhaps that was on purpose.
That's the amount of credit I had left. Will see if it is enough.
Would it be enough to just point out the mistakes you have? Or do you want the correct derivation as well? Because I've seen two mistakes already.
The derivation doesn't have to be detailed, but would like a rough sketch and answers.
I've finished writing a response explaining the correct idea and listing the mistakes you made. I would submit it immediately for $25.
Thank you for your suggestions. It was my understanding that for Brownian motion, mu = 0 and sigma = 1. Thus, the terms I did not include are not needed. However, I still end up with the incorrect values - I might just be an idiot at calculating this, but could you provide the values of the parameters?
I will edit my reponse to address your comment. But bare in mind that S_i are not Brownian motions. W_i are brownian motions.
Increased it to 25 :) Looking forward to it
Thank you so much Mathe. Your explanation really helped me understand it. Have you received the money?
I did! Thank you!