$Explain proof of directional derivative$

Question

$Explain proof of directional derivative$

I will try to mark the exact thing I don't understand, it comes from this thread https://matchmaticians.com/questions/u6me4r#answers :
What I don't understand is when we have $$g(h)=f(x_0+ha,y_0+hb)$$
That means that when 'h'(independent variable) changes in g(h), it will produce the same change in 'h' of f(x0+ha,y0+hb).
Derivative formula says that:
$$g'(x) = \lim_{{h \to 0}}\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}$$
so just changing variable name I receive
$$g'(h) = \lim_{{\Delta{h} \to 0}}\frac{g(h+\Delta{h})-g(h)}{\Delta{h}}$$
And when I want to find it's derivative at 0 I receive:
$$g'(0) = \lim_{{\Delta{h} \to 0}}\frac{g(0+\Delta{h})-g(0)}{\Delta{h}} = \lim_{{\Delta{h} \to 0}}\frac{g(\Delta{h})-g(0)}{\Delta{h}}$$
So the question is since $$g(h)=f(x_0+ha,y_0+hb)$$
Why can I replace $$g(\Delta{h}) by f(x_0+ha,y_0+hb)$$
Since by replacing it I will receive not $$f(x_0+ha,y_0+hb)$$ but $$f(x_0+\Delta{h}a,y_0+\Delta{h}b)$$
P.S. I understand how directional derivatives work, I don't want you to explain it, I just want the explanation of this particular case please, feel free to ask for more money,.

Calculus

Babaduras

106

Report

Answer

The answer is accepted.

Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing Program to earn up to a 50% commission on every question that your affiliated users ask or answer.

Answer 1

Answers can only be viewed under the following conditions:

The questioner was satisfied with and accepted the answer, or
The answer was evaluated as being 100% correct by the judge.

View the answer

I think you are confsusing $h$ and $\Delta h$. Both these variable are used as variables which will go to zero in the limit, and you should only use one. Otherwise it will be confusing. You can NOT replace

$$g(\Delta{h}) by f(x_0+ha,y_0+hb).$$

Since $$g(h)=f(x_0+ ha,y_0+ h b),$$
by replacing $h$ by $\Delta h$ in the above equation we get

$$g(\Delta{h}) =f(x_0+\Delta ha,y_0+\Delta h b).$$

Note also that there should not be any $h$ in the following computations

$$g'(0) = \lim_{{\Delta{h} \to 0}}\frac{g(0+\Delta{h})-g(0)}{\Delta{h}} = \lim_{{\Delta{h} \to 0}}\frac{g(\Delta{h})-g(0)}{\Delta{h}}.$$

Indeed the proof will not make much sense if you replace $$g(\Delta{h}) by f(x_0+ha,y_0+hb).$$

Erdos

4.8K

Erdos

0

Let me know if you need any clarifications.
Babaduras

0

yeah, I think I was confusing delta(h) and (h) all the time. so correct case for derivative of g at 0 is g'(0) = limit of (g(delta(h) - g(0))/delta(h) with delta(h) approaching zero, replaceing g(h) with f(x0+ha,y0+hb) will give me limit of (f(x0+delta(h)a,y0+(delta(h)b) - f(x0,y0))/delta(h) with delta(h) approaching zero ?
- Erdos
  
  0
  
  Replacing g(h) with f(x0+ha,y0+hb) will give me limit of (f(x0+ha,y0+hb) - f(x0,y0))/h with h approaching zero. You statement "replaceing g(h) with f(x0+ha,y0+hb) will give me limit of (f(x0+delta(h)a,y0+(delta(h)b) - f(x0,y0))/delta(h) with delta(h) approaching zero" has the same problem. Remember, you either use h or \Delta h. It does not make sense to use both in one computation.
- Babaduras
  
  0
  
  yeah, I got it, I mean that since g(h) = f(x0+ha,y0+hb), then replacing h with delta(h) will give me imit of (f(x0+delta(h)a,y0+(delta(h)b) - f(x0,y0))/delta(h) with delta(h) approaching zero
- Erdos
  
  0
  
  That's correct.

$Explain proof of directional derivative$

Answer

Related Questions

Search