How do we define a unique, satisfying expected value from chosen sequences of bounded functions converging to an explicit, everywhere surjective function?
Consider the following attatchment [1]. See if there are research papers which address the topics in the attatched article.
In the paper, consider the following:
Question 1: How do we define "satisfying" in $\S$3.2, so that $\mathbb{E}[f_r]$ answers $\S$1?
Question 2: If question 1 is unclear, how do we improve $\S$4.2, so that the answer to $\S$4.2 answers $\S$3.2 and $\mathbb{E}[f_r]=\mathbb{E}[f_r^{\star}]$ answers $\S$1?
Question 3: What am I "measuring" in $\S$5.2? Is there a credible well-known version of my "measure"?
In case you need help, you can post concrete questions on Mathematics and Math Overflow.
Finally, how much money should I offer?
Edit: I asked the support team to delete all the other files.
Edit 2: There were mistakes with the notations in $\S$3.1 onward. I have made adjustments.
- unanswered
- 757 views
- $100.00
Related Questions
- Functions undergrad
- Prove that $f$ is a diffeomorphism $C^∞$, that maps... (More inside)
- Reflexive Banach Space and Duality
- Compounding interest of principal P, where a compounding withdrawal amount W get withdrawn from P before each compounding of P.
- Summation of Catalan Convolution
- Function Invertibility/Inverse & Calculus, One question. Early Uni/College level
- How to derive the term acting like a first derivative with respect to A that I found by accident?
- Subspace of a Normed Linear Space