# What does it mean for regression to only be normally distributed in the vertical direction and correlation to be normally distributed in horizontal and vertical directions?

What I'm really looking for is a comparison of the assumption for normality for correlation and regression.

Faithalone

361

## Answer

**Answers can be viewed only if**

- The questioner was satisfied and accepted the answer, or
- The answer was disputed, but the judge evaluated it as 100% correct.

1 Attachment

Mathe

2.9K

The answer is accepted.

Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing
Program to earn up to 50% commission on every question your affiliated users ask or answer.

- answered
- 420 views
- $15.00

### Related Questions

- Five married couples are seated around a table at random. Let $X$ be the number of wives who sit next to their husbands. What is the expectation of $X$ $(E[X])$?
- Proper Test Selection for Repeated Interval Data Collection?
- Why is the t-test for two independent samples $\ t^* = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{S_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{S_2^2}{n_2}}}$?
- Compute the cumulative density function of X
- Let $X$ be a single observation from the density $f(x) = (2θx + 1 − θ)I[0,1](x)$ with $−1≤ θ ≤ 1$. Find the most powerful test of size $α$ and its power
- Question about sample size calculation for a single arm long term follow-up study
- Check if problems are correct
- Statistics involving a numerical variable and a nonnumerical variable (date)

It would be a lot easier if you told us where did you find these statements. As it is, 'correlation being normally distributed' does not make sense. A correlation is a statistical measure (of theoretical quantity) that measures the degree of dependence between two sets of paired observations (or random variables). Typically, this measure is bounded between 1 and -1, so not even the sampling version of correlation could ever be normally distributed. I fear this statement is missing context.

My bad. I read this from my class noted and I rewrote it from memory incorrectly. What I meant to say was that correlation assumes data is normally distributed in the vertical direction and regression assumes data is normally distributed in the horizontal and vertical directions.

I think you have it backwards. Regression only assumes the y or vertical axis is normally distributed. The x or horizontal axis can have any distribution, since we always run regression on y conditional on x values (the x values are treated as constants). On correlation , when data is normally distributed on both axis, the correlation coefficient is a fundamental parameter of the data. But one could measure and talk about correlation coefficient for non normal data without any issues at all.

I had it backwards - you're right. If you leave a comparison for the assumption of normality for correlation and regression, I'll accept the answer. I apologize for the confusion.

Could you extend the time?

I just extended it.