# What does it mean for regression to only be normally distributed in the vertical direction and correlation to be normally distributed in horizontal and vertical directions?

What I'm really looking for is a comparison of the assumption for normality for correlation and regression.

Faithalone

361

## Answer

**Answers can only be viewed under the following conditions:**

- The questioner was satisfied with and accepted the answer, or
- The answer was evaluated as being 100% correct by the judge.

1 Attachment

Mathe

3.2K

The answer is accepted.

Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing
Program to earn up to a 50% commission on every question that your affiliated users ask or answer.

- answered
- 547 views
- $15.00

### Related Questions

- What is the normal probability distribution function?
- Quantile function of CDF
- Find the maximum likelihood estimate
- Can someone explain why the attached R-Studio Code, provided by the author, does not create the output like in his book?
- Proper Test Selection for Repeated Interval Data Collection?
- Stochastic Analysis question
- Help me to understand the chi square distribution
- Finding two importance functions

It would be a lot easier if you told us where did you find these statements. As it is, 'correlation being normally distributed' does not make sense. A correlation is a statistical measure (of theoretical quantity) that measures the degree of dependence between two sets of paired observations (or random variables). Typically, this measure is bounded between 1 and -1, so not even the sampling version of correlation could ever be normally distributed. I fear this statement is missing context.

My bad. I read this from my class noted and I rewrote it from memory incorrectly. What I meant to say was that correlation assumes data is normally distributed in the vertical direction and regression assumes data is normally distributed in the horizontal and vertical directions.

I think you have it backwards. Regression only assumes the y or vertical axis is normally distributed. The x or horizontal axis can have any distribution, since we always run regression on y conditional on x values (the x values are treated as constants). On correlation , when data is normally distributed on both axis, the correlation coefficient is a fundamental parameter of the data. But one could measure and talk about correlation coefficient for non normal data without any issues at all.

I had it backwards - you're right. If you leave a comparison for the assumption of normality for correlation and regression, I'll accept the answer. I apologize for the confusion.

Could you extend the time?

I just extended it.