Matchmaticians
Home How it works Log in Sign up
Matchmaticians
  • Home
  • Search
  • How it works
  • Ask Question
  • Tags
  • Support
  • Affiliate Program
  • Log in
  • Sign up

Using the auxiliary hypothesis metatheorem prove ⊢ (∃x)A → (∃x) ( A ∧ (A ∨ B) )

Please use the graphical technique. 

Here is an example of it:

http://www.diag.uniroma1.it/liberato/planning/tableau/multiple-04.png

Logic
Ih8Myl1Fe Ih8Myl1Fe
Report
  • Share:
  • Ih8Myl1Fe Ih8Myl1Fe

    The auxiliary hypothesis is: "Suppose that Γ ⊢ (∃x)A."

  • Alessandro Iraci Alessandro Iraci

    I don't understand the technique. Can you give a definition rather than an example?

  • closed
  • 90 views
  • $4.92

Related Questions

  • Logic Question  ¬¬𝐴→𝐴 
  • Logic Questions (𝐴→𝐶)∧(𝐵→𝐶)⊢(𝐴∧𝐵)→𝐶
  • Induction proof for an algorithm. Introductory level discrete math course. See attachment for details
  • Questions about computability Theory, Logic
  • Logic Question  (𝐴→(𝐵→𝐶))→((𝐴→𝐵)→(𝐴→𝐶))
  • Logic Question 𝐴∧(𝐵∨𝐶)⊢(𝐴∧𝐵)∨(𝐴∧𝐶)
  • Logic Question 𝐴→(𝐵→𝐶),𝐴→𝐵,𝐴⊢𝐶
  • Logic equation 
Home
Support
Ask
Log in
  • About
  • About Us
  • How it works
  • Review Process
  • matchmaticians
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Affiliate Program
  • Questions
  • Newest
  • Featured
  • Unanswered
  • Contact
  • Help & Support Request
  • Give Us Feedback

Get the Matchmaticians app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store Get Matchmaticians on Google Play
Copyright © 2019 - 2023 Matchmaticians LLC - All Rights Reserved

Search

Search Enter a search term to find results in questions