Using the auxiliary hypothesis metatheorem prove ⊢ (∃x)A → (∃x) ( A ∧ (A ∨ B) )
Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing
Program to earn up to a 50% commission on every question that your affiliated users ask or answer.
- closed
- 689 views
- $4.92
Related Questions
- Logic Question ¬¬𝐴→𝐴
- Combinatorics Questions: Card Pairs, Letter Arrangements, and Number Sequences
- Logic Question 𝐴∨𝐵→𝐶⊢(𝐴→𝐶)∧(𝐵→𝐶)
- Logic Question 𝐴∧(𝐵∨𝐶)⊢(𝐴∧𝐵)∨(𝐴∧𝐶)
- Logic quesiton A v ¬A
- Induction proof for an algorithm. Introductory level discrete math course. See attachment for details
- I have a question for 0/0 being undefined and wonder if anybody has a refutation.
- Characterizing the Infinitely Visited Intersections in a Ride-Forever Path on a Directed Graph
The auxiliary hypothesis is: "Suppose that Γ ⊢ (∃x)A."
I don't understand the technique. Can you give a definition rather than an example?