A problem on almost singular measures in real analysis
Suppose that $\mu$ and $\nu$ are finite measures on a measurable space $(X,\mathcal{M})$. Prove that either $\nu \perp \mu$ or there exists $\epsilon > 0$ and a measurable set $E \subseteq X$ such that $\mu(E) > 0$ and $\nu \ge \epsilon \mu$ on $E$ (that is, every measurable set $S \subseteq E$ has $\nu(S) \ge \epsilon \mu(S)$).

53
Answer
Answers can only be viewed under the following conditions:
- The questioner was satisfied with and accepted the answer, or
- The answer was evaluated as being 100% correct by the judge.
46
The answer is accepted.
Join Matchmaticians Affiliate Marketing
Program to earn up to a 50% commission on every question that your affiliated users ask or answer.
- answered
- 1358 views
- $7.00
Related Questions
- Analyzing the Domain and Range of the Function $f(x) = \frac{1}{1 - \sin x}$
- How do we describe an intuitive arithmetic mean that gives the following? (I can't type more than 200 letters)
- Accumulation points question (Real Analysis)
- Prove that $p_B :\prod_{\alpha \in A} X_\alpha \to \prod_{\alpha \in B} X_\alpha$ is a continuous map
- Define $F : \mathbb{R}^ω → \mathbb{R}^ω$ by $F(x)_n = \sum^n_{k=1} x_k$. Determine whether $F$ restricts to give a well-defined map $F : (\ell_p, d_p) → (\ell_q, d_q)$
- Question on a pre-measure defined by Folland's real analysis book
- real analysis
- Prove the following limits of a sequence of sets?