Interpretation of signifcance of continous by continous regression with interaction term

Hello,
I am running a regression with a continous DP (scale of self-assesement of a person´s willingness to accept pay cuts to protect the climate) and two continous IVs (1=age 2=value-index) and their interaction.
My hypothesis is that age has a negative effect on a person´s willingness to accept said paycut and want to control it with IV2 for a person´s political values. In short: When holding values constant, does age still have the negative effect?

In Model 1, the Interaction and IV 2 are significant, while the IV 1 is not. In Model 2 only IV 2 is signficant. I have created marginplots but need some input in regard of the interpretation of the signficance in both Models.

1. Can I say that IV 1 has no significant effect on the DP in Model 1 and 2 and therefore I cannot accept my hypothesis?
2. How do I interpret an non-siginifacnt Interaction Term?
3. Is it still okay to show the plots of average marginal effects and predicitve margins for illustrative purposes and add a "non-significant but still relevant - mark"?



Here for more visual explanation

  Model 1 Model 2  
Age -0.4 -0.6  
Value-Index 1.1*** 1.2***  
Age#Value-Index -0.01** -0.002  



Thank you very much for any input

Answer

Answers can be viewed only if
  1. The questioner was satisfied and accepted the answer, or
  2. The answer was disputed, but the judge evaluated it as 100% correct.
View the answer
The answer is accepted.